Skip to content

The Darkness is Upon Us: On Despair and Duty

We hear a lot about our culture of despair these days. Many people are noticing how pervasive things like depression, anxiety, loneliness, addition, and a general rootless, drifting apathy seem to be in the twenty-first century West. The causes are myriad and there are plenty of excellent diagnoses out there, from the technological to the social to the intellectual to the spiritual. But what is to be done? As is so often the case, the diagnosis is so much easier than the cure.

I came across two responses recently that struck me as representative of the broad options before us. The first was from author Katherine May who was a guest on a podcast called The Sacred. At one point, the conversation turned to fan mail. May never responds, she says. Too much of it is people looking for help, for advice, for therapy, for sympathy, for pastoral care, even. It’s not reasonable to expect authors to fill this role:

We are the pit canaries of a huge failure of the mental health system in our society, and of the social care system, and of community and care just breaking down. But think I feel increasingly a responsibility to show people the stuff I’m not doing, and that I can’t do, and that I can’t be expected to do…

I don’t fully know how to manage it. And I know now that I am… being called on to offer leadership. The complicated things for me is that I don’t seek that leadership… But it’s unavoidable to notice how many people are sort of seeking a flock, and are seeking a wider community to be in, but also they’re seeking the figureheads that can help them to unravel the world a bit and make sense of it for them.

Ok, so that’s one response. The second comes from Australian musician and author Nick Cave. In a recent edition of his Red Hand Files — a forum where Cave just responds, often at length and with no small amount of wisdom and candour, to the questions of his fans — he was asked about how he can possibly respond to people’s grief as much as he does. Is it cathartic for him? Therapeutic? In some way inspirational? Here’s how he responded:

I don’t find the process of replying to these letters cathartic or therapeutic, although it may well have been when I started The Red Hand Files. Neither do I find writing my replies inspirational, in the sense that it does not inspire me, for example, to write a song. Mostly I see what I do as a human duty, I feel I am playing my part in what has become an ever-expanding and robustly vulnerable community of soul-barers. In this space I have come face to face with a kind of truth – a truth that has embedded itself in my life, and which demands something of me, whether I like it or not. I don’t mean that it is some kind of burden, it is anything but, for duty is often the very thing that ultimately bears the greatest rewards. To act dutifully is to acknowledge that things matter, that things have value and are worth caring for.

The Red Hand Files have become a quietly instructive influence over the way I try to live my life, which is openly and with curiosity. They are a kind of existential condition, a means by which to navigate the world, a way to be. They have also, perplexingly, brought to light a kind of ministering impulse that I am both proud of and somewhat embarrassed by. Whatever it is that is going on here at The Red Hand Files, it is a true privilege to be a part of it and I thank you all for that. It is never more than I can handle.

Now, I want to be very careful with what I say here. I am very well aware that people have very different capacities and inclinations. Not everyone is called or gifted to do the kind of thing Nick Cave does. Katherine May is surely at least partially correct to say that it’s unreasonable to expect artists and writers to provide pastoral care to their legions of followers. There is no one-size-fits-all approach here. This is true.

And yet.

I was struck by the chasm between the nature of the two responses. May’s default is to outsource the pain of the world to “mental health system in our society.” She acknowledges that it goes beyond that. She refers to “community care” breaking down and that there is a vacuum that religion and family once filled, however inadequately. But she also clearly sees herself as doing a service to her fans by not responding to them. She is teaching them the importance of self-care, boundaries, etc.

Cave, on the other hand, wades right in. He appeals to things like “duty” and locates himself in a wider community of “soul-barers” who have a responsibility to be bear one another’s burdens and be vehicles of truth to one another. Cave obviously does not respond to every letter or request he receives, but neither does he hide behind “self-care” or “boundaries” or some other such thing. He clearly sees his pain (he has lost two sons in tragic circumstances) as something to steward with care and to perhaps be a path into healing and hope and responsibility for others.

I doubt it will surprise any to learn which approach I favour. “Mental health” is increasingly becoming a bloated and unwieldy category into which we pour all our pain and confusion and sorrow and rage and existential angst. It’s a government problem, we often seem to think. It’s something to leave in the hands of “the professionals” and “the experts.” They’ll fix it. Dumping the whole mess into the bucket of “mental health” absolves us (we think) from reckoning honestly with our spiritual poverty, our failure to attend to our families and our communities, our unwillingness to view our neighbours as in any sense people to whom we might have something like a duty.

As I was writing this post, a new song from Josh Garrels was playing my headphones. It’s called “Watchman” and it speaks to me of the importance of a faith and a hope that transcend all our despair and all our partial attempts to address it. Our duty to bear one another’s burdens is negotiated in the broader frame of a promise whose fulfillment we still wait for, a morning that has yet to finally break.

I’m waiting on Your promise
Even through the trauma that swept my friends away
The darkness is upon us
The death of saints and psalmists
But I will sing my song for You anyway

Because You’re all I have Lord, You are the way
And I’ll always love You and I will wait
Like a watchman at the gate
Waiting for morning to break

20 Comments Post a comment
  1. May reads here as being lost between conflicting secular themes of vocational rights and perogatives and personal accountabilities.

    I could say a lot of things about writers who tacitly acknowledge their muse stirs up a response in their readership but then completely divorce themselves from any moral requirement to address those concerns. One thing I wouldn’t call any of it is, “Sacred”.

    Mr. Cave’s heart seems to be in the right place but if you’ve read his woeful defense of, “Why God is a He” you quickly realize his sympathies are sometimes more contemporary in their spirit, then they are biblical. He is also right to point out that he isn’t exploiting his activities to provide fodder for his musical career but he has to take care that he doesn’t exploit faith for a potential new career as an author and on line therapist. Fame, fortune and faith make strange bedfellows, indeed.

    I like that you bring it all back to relationship with God but I guess, as always, I try to provoke you into a more tangible expression of what that relationship looks like and how to foster it.

    Thanks again, for another enjoyable and interesting read.

    March 11, 2024
    • I could say a lot of things about writers who tacitly acknowledge their muse stirs up a response in their readership but then completely divorce themselves from any moral requirement to address those concerns. One thing I wouldn’t call any of it is, “Sacred”.”

      Seriously? I have “completely divorced” myself from “any moral requirement” to address your concerns over the years, have I?

      Well, again, I would welcome anyone to survey over a decade’s worth of interactions on this blog and draw their own conclusions about whether or not this is true. Nick Cave, so far as I can tell, responds once to people on the Red Hand Files. I dare say I’ve gone a bit beyond that with you.

      March 11, 2024
      • I honestly wasn’t thinking about you when I wrote that. It was about May and others.

        For example, I would include all (almost all?…I can’t think of an exception) the high profile MSM media talking heads, in Canada.

        They are more than prepared to engage with and nuance a progressive perspective but quickly dismiss any alternative perspective as, “far right” or “Trumpism”. Fair heairing for one side of the debate, ad hominem for the other.

        I’m not gonna lie, I did, on the reread before posting, recognize the innuendo, and I laughed. “Shoes on the other foot”, this time, I thought and posted as is.

        It does lead to interesting moral questions though. What are our true motives when we write? What are our accountabilities to an audience and to each other, when we engage?

        If you don’t mind me saying, I ‘m more than happy to wrangle with you over substantive issues and disagreements and you need not worry too much about my feelings. Sometimes disagreements get contentious, issues matter and there is always an offensive component to any disagreement, baked in. If you cross a line, you’ll apologise. If I do, so will I.

        Reading your work and expressing my opinion, has strengthened my beliefs and improved my writing skills. I’m truly grateful.

        It doesn’t appear that you’ve received any reciprical benefit. That bothers my sense of pride a little, used to bother me more but perhaps that’s the point. Maybe the humbling experience is preparing me for what lies ahead. Do I write something because I believe it to be true, or because I’m seeking approval? Perhaps more of the latter than is healthy.

        The war is here and if I intend to be a useful prophet and God is willing to use me, any spirit seeking approval is a detriment to the cause.

        In any case, don’t take the innuendo too much to heart. Think of it as more of a wedgie from an annoying, “big brother” than as an attack on your character.😎😜

        March 12, 2024
      • I honestly wasn’t thinking about you when I wrote that. It was about May and others.

        I’m not going to lie, I find this extremely difficult to believe. I will try to take you at your word.

        March 12, 2024
      • Fair enough, though I don’t think you do yourself any favours when you clip a portion of a response from the entire piece. It often creates a different narrative from the one expressed.

        For example, I also told you later in my post that I recognized the innuendo during my reread, laughed and posted it anyway.

        I did so because I have previously read/read into your posts, innuendo that didn’t seem to flatter me…and so it goes.😁

        Let’s choose, for neither of us can know for certain, the other’s true intentions, to extend each other a little grace and not worry about possible personal sleights.

        I’m wrestling with ideas and the spirits that motivate them and not with the people that express them.

        March 12, 2024
      • And I’m not sure you do yourself many favours when you frequently combine careless personal remarks with long rambling comments that are often only tangentially (at best) related to the themes of my posts and seem more interested in advancing your own agenda than anything resembling dialogue. So it goes.

        As I’ve said before, I think I have extended plenty of grace over the years. More than many might have, I dare say.

        March 12, 2024
      • Is it possible that the issues you present might sometimes miss the mark?

        March 12, 2024
      • Of course it’s possible.

        Do you think it’s possible that relentlessly beating the same drum, funnelling everything you read here through the same grid, treating every post as a diagnostic of my (or someone else’s?) spiritual condition, and being almost constantly negative does not incline people to engage much with you?

        (I realize you think we are “at war” and that desperate times call for desperate measures, etc. You’ve made this clear in the past.)

        March 13, 2024
  2. Joe #

    In some ways, this feels like an extension of the old Charles Barkley ‘I am not a role model’ commercial and the ensuing dialogue. May, like Barkley, argues “just because you like me for X, you look to me for insight on W, Y & Z… but that’s not what I’m equipped to do.” It’s a much-needed reminder to keep your celebrity worship in check, and that you may need to take a little bit of personal accountability in addressing your problems instead of offloading it all on others.

    I can understand that point to an extent. I started skipping the latter half of one of my favorite podcasts – specifically, the fan Q&A portion – because it seemed like nearly every question was prefaced with the writer venting their emotional troubles. This is a comedy podcast, mind you. I would hear it and think “this must be a real pain for the hosts to have people constantly heaping their personal troubles onto them.”

    That said, I do think I agree more with Cave and his talk of duty and obligation. I know he frames it more as part of the interaction between soul-bearers and shared pain, but I would say it applies to the more general concept of ‘fame’. Even if it is sometimes misguided, people look up to you for what you do, and value your opinions, insight or even just your attention. Truly embracing this level of recognition means that you can’t just glean the perks and shirk the duty and obligations that it comes with.

    March 12, 2024
    • I don’t think celebrity worship is the issue, at least it isn’t for me. I see a world of people who instinctively know, even if they cannot formulate the argument, that we live in an age of such moral degeneracy, that few, if any, public voices can be trusted. So when you find a voice that sounds trustworty about X, you immediately look for some understanding about Y and Z especially if Y and Z have more relevence to your life situation than X.

      I like what you say about Nick Cave but I see the conflict of interest for him given his new found fame as something of an on-line therapist. He’ll have to navigate carefully.

      The better sides of most people, are desperate for love. Desperate for truth.The real problem is likely the entire economic model itself or even the fact that there is an economic model attached to things like love and truth.

      “What is given to you freely should be given by you freely.”

      “You cannot serve, God and money.”

      March 12, 2024
    • Interesting story about the comedy podcast, Joe. I think it speaks to one of the (few) things that I did agree with in the Katherine May interview which is that there is an enormous vacuum that was once filled by things like the church, and many people are, as she says, “seeking a flock, seeking a wider community to be in… seeking the figureheads that can help them to unravel the world a bit and make sense of it for them.”

      In many ways, people no longer know where to go with all their personal troubles. Loneliness is epidemic. Many people have few friends. Community participation has fallen off a cliff. Same for church attendance. So, authors and rock stars now find themselves in the position of pastors and therapists. It’s a bizarre world that we live in.

      March 12, 2024
      • You are free to engage with whatever you choose to. As are we all. To suggest that A isn’t as useful as B in solving a crisis, isn’t to say that A is off limits. It’s a question of priority.

        I see a major crisis of faith and a war. You don’t seem to. I see Christianity in rapid decline and a western culture that has run morally amuck. Perhaps you don’t. I see something akin to a Babylonian exile and a persecution of faith, looming on the horizon. I see the end of the judeo-christian west and an emerging corporate fascist state that will exterminate billions if successful or perhaps lead to the ruin and destruction of most, if not all of the planet, if they fail. That’s what motivates me. It isn’t about you.

        I used to think that you could be a tremendous voice for the faith when the trouble came. I no longer think that. You do not see what I see. I still find engaging with a man of your intelligence forces me to be at the top of my game and for that reason I persist. I have to dig deep to keep up with you and I know that by doing that, I am better prepared for the future.

        March 14, 2024
      • You’re right, I don’t see things in precisely the way you do (even if I agree that there is much that is deeply concerning these days). But even if I did, the question remains: How would the risen Christ have us live and speak in these times? What does “going to war” look like for those who have pledged our allegiance to Jesus?

        I suspect that our differing responses to this question accounts for a good deal of your dissatisfaction with me. This is fine. I have no desire to be the specific kind of “tremendous voice” that you seem to be seeking. There are plenty of those voices out there already.

        March 16, 2024
  3. Then if it’s possible for you to miss the mark it ought to be possible to confront your work, if and when you do.

    Your assessment of my efforts here, when judged solely by their interpersonal impact, has merit. There is truth to it. But I don’t think that tells the whole story, or further still, what’s most important about the story.

    I believe, as a Christian, that the most important part of any person’s being is their soul and the spirit that animates the soul. That which is eternal, about us. That which is from God, and is of God. It’s something of a messy business and a mystery to me, as the soul is clearly embodied in a material being, a person, an identity.

    This identity has a personality, appetites, perspectives, opinions and ways of being. This identity, this, “self” is in fact is so consciously present to a person, that they can and often do live as if this, “self” is the only self.

    I am convicted by the Holy Spirit of God that we are in eternal, immortal danger if we think that.

    This is the self that must die. “We must die to self”, so that the soul and the Holy Spirit that animates the real being within us may be, “born again”.

    How does one kill off the most materially real ( to themselves) part of their being, without relentless struggle, without continually straining themselves through what often times can feel like a merciless, moralistic grid? Just how should we respond to voices within our community that downplay or often ignore the reality of our predicament?

    Love is eternal. Love wins in the end. Yes, yes and yes!…But if we are to take sacred scripture seriously most of us won’t be there to celebrate that outcome.

    Working through the Holy Spirit, we have to slay the dragons within us and around us, first.

    March 13, 2024
    • Sure, confront away. Just don’t be annoyed if/when I don’t respond. I’ve invested a lot of time responding to you over the years. We see some things differently. I’m not particularly troubled by this.

      For what it’s worth, I don’t think that in my writing here or in my pastoral work I in any way “downplay or ignore the reality of our predicament.” I may choose to address it in different ways than you do. You may wish that I wrote in different ways or emphasized different things. That’s fine. What I will say is that I try to write and to speak in such a way as to never shut down conversation unnecessarily. This is a priority of mine and I believe it to be faithful to what God has called me to be and to do in the world.

      March 13, 2024
      • I truly don’t know how to get through to you. I’m genuinely sorry for that.

        It is likely then, if what I write here is useful to another, it isn’t meant for you.

        Thank you for continuing to allow me to respond.

        March 13, 2024
      • What if you don’t need to “get through to me?” I’m a committed Christian. I’m all in. I’m even on the payroll. Given your recent comments about leaving the Roman Catholic Church, I might assume (with some trepidation) that you’re not even trying to convert me to Catholicism any more.

        If “getting through to me” means convincing me of engaging with issues and the world and faith in precisely the way that you do, maybe that’s not a good goal to have. I certainly don’t expect you to parrot my every opinion. The kingdom is a big and wide and beautiful place, after all. There’s room for some difference of emphasis and approach.

        March 13, 2024
      • I was apologizing for my inability to communicate to you, that all of us, you included, me included, they included; all of us, cannot be engaging with the Holy Spirit, in the manner in which we should be. The fruits of a failed and failing church are everywhere.

        The fruits of a failed and failing church are everywhere!

        Either, God or our faith, is insufficient.

        Either, God or our faith, is insufficient!

        Engaging with secular values is not the answer. A deeper engagement with the Holy Spirit leading to a reframing and resetting of how Christians ought to behave in a secular society, is the answer.

        Perhaps “being on the payroll” is part of the problem. Jesus instructs us that what He gave us freely, we should also give freely. Surely the Pharasetical spirit abounds where money, authority and noteriety are made available to His Apostles. (A name I think we should reclaim so as not to misunderstand who we are and what our priorities should be.)

        In the end, I have failed you if I have led you to believe that I want you to express your faith precisely as I do. What I hope to encourage, is for everyone to express their faith precisely as the Holy Spirit of God instructs them to.

        March 14, 2024
      • I’m sorry, I simply do not agree with you. Yet again, I find it fascinating that you feel so free to diagnose other people’s level of “engagement with the Holy Spirit.” The fact that you deem the church to be “failing” could be a sign of a lack of faith. Or it could be that a faithful remnant remains. The size and strength or cultural influence of an institution is not necessarily an indication of its faithfulness. The life and teaching of Jesus should make this plain (to say nothing of church history).

        And, I’m sorry, but engaging with the “secular” world around me is not something I am going to stop doing. I believe that God is not so easily extinguished, not so easily compartmentalized into “religious” and “secular” portions of the world, one of which is off limits. God is always speaking, even in a world that seems determined to forget or ignore him. I see the longing all around me. I am not going to stop looking for it, interrogating it, or bringing it into the light. Acts 17 serves as one (among other) examples of this in Scripture. Paul looks around at the religiosity of the world around him and seeks to make connections with the gospel. He starts with where people are and seeks to move the conversation Christ-ward. I try to do the same.

        If this troubles you or you consider it to be unfaithful, then at the risk of repeating myself ad nauseum, you are free to seek the kind of engagement you would prefer elsewhere.

        March 14, 2024
  4. Thanks for your last comment. It reads more reflective in tone and less defensive. How would the “Risen Christ” have us respond to war?…if there were to be one…that’s the question. For me and for many, that is the only societal issue worth pondering.

    RAMBLING DIGRESSION 1:

    The difference in my approach to you now and since about 2019 (give or take, I’m lousy with timelines) is that I’m really not concerned about what either of us thinks, apart from what we are prepared to proclaim is a discernment from the Holy Spirit. For me it is the first test and question to put before anyone who dares to speak to God’s children, about God’s kingdom. “What does the Holy Spirit tell you?”

    If you want to be in the army, put on the uniform, so to speak.

    I honestly believe, as a spiritual discernment, (no judgement upon or malice intended towards anyone), that it is imperative, through prayer, that we believe our words are from God, before we speak them.

    The Spirit teaches, and we share what we are taught. That’s it. That’s all…

    So how should we behave?

    On a purely analytical level, examining scripture, it’ hard to know. After all, using the Lord’s own words the answer seem to be somewhere between, “I come… to bring a sword”..and “He who lives by the sword dies by the sword”. Pretty broad and conflicting parameters, to say the least.

    My spiritual discernments are more helpful.

    RAMBLING DIGRESSION 2

    Through prayer, I believe that many methods and approaches are useful. Each are called differently, as per their gifts. All must defer to the Holy Spirit for instruction. No one is to knowingly respond or take action of their own initiative.

    Self defence of the truth and of the children of God is permitted. Some will be called. Heaven has it’s armies, operating solely at the discretion of the Holy Spirit/the will of God. Mankind may/must have it’s armies also providing the above spiritual conditions are met.

    Some will be instructed to speak for the truth. They will be instructed to speak publicly and persistently for as long as they are able. They are to remain non-violent. They must not betray the truth. If they remain faithful to the Spirit, they won’t. Some may have to accept martyrdom as a consequence. If they remain faithful to the Spirit they will accept this outcome for the glory of God, fellowship with the Lord Jesus Christ and as an encouraging sign for others.

    Still others, will go underground. Protecting the, Word and the defenceless from harm. They will be instructed to live and exemplify a vastly different life from what modern western society presently lives.

    In all things, in all ways, our love for God, self and each other never wavers for those who remain faithful to the promptings of the, Holy Spirit.

    “Greater things shall we do”…

    March 18, 2024

Leave a comment