Skip to content

Haunted (Whispers in a Ruined House)

He looks at me warily as he approaches the guard’s station at the jail. He’s thirty-something, huge beard, menacing tattoos snaking up and around his neck and bald head. I stand there, inoffensively, with my clipboard and my death notification. “I’m a chaplain here, just wondering if you’d like to talk to someone about losing your dad?” I motion over to the interview room over in the corner of the unit and start to walk in that direction. His expression doesn’t change. “Not really,” says. He follows me anyway.

I sit down on one of the plastic chairs and gesture toward the other one. He stays standing. He’s looking anywhere but at me. He doesn’t want to be here. “I don’t really need to talk or to pray or whatever.” he says. “That’s fine,” I reply. “You know, you don’t have to be here. I just thought I’d come down and check on you.” He’s still staring at the door, but he sits down. He talks briefly about his mom, his brother, his kids, about how his dad and mom look after them while he’s inside. I ask a few questions that are met with a few cursory responses. He stands up and starts walking toward the door. He’s done.

“You know,” he says, “it is what it is. We’re born, we live, we die, that’s it.” I measure my response carefully. “I don’t think that’s it, actually.” He looks at me for the first time in our brief interaction. “Yeah, I don’t either, actually. I think we live on. And we can haunt people from the afterlife.” And with that, he was gone. No “goodbye,” no “thanks for the gesture.” Not even a “nice try, dude.” I sit there, inoffensively, with my clipboard and my death notification. I cringe to think of who this guy might be looking forward to haunting from the afterlife. And why. And how.

According to Merriam Webster, to “haunt” is “to visit or inhabit” or “to have a disquieting or harmful effect on eventually.” I rather suspect that my conversation partner had the latter in mind. He was looking forward to menacing his enemies from beyond the grave. But to “haunt” can also mean “to stay around or persist; to linger.”  And in this sense, we do, of course, “haunt” those we leave behind. Our absences leave a hole where a presence once was. We linger, we persist, for good or for ill. For a while.

What is true of people is also true of beliefs, of cultural frameworks, of moral assumptions. The twenty-first century post-Christian secular West is haunted by its past. In countless ways—in that which we find good, true, and beautiful, in that which we assume we owe our neighbours, in our convictions about justice, in our politics and the assumptions that underly them, in the meaning we demand for our suffering, and many other things besides—we are far more Christian than we realize or probably prefer. We are deeply confused, incoherent, and inconsistent about much of the above, to be sure. But our cultural assumptions are unintelligible apart from the Christian soil from which they sprung. The risen Christ and all he brought into the world lingers. He persists, even among and amidst those who claim to want nothing to do with him. His is a beautiful haunting.

And it shows up in all kinds of places. Rock and roll, for example. I came across two relatively new songs in the last little while that give voice, I think, to this haunting. The first is a new single by Foo Fighters called “Asking for a Friend.” I was struck by these lines:

What is real? I’m asking for a friend
Or is this the end?

Give me a reason, show me a sign
Ugliest truth or the prettiest lie

I feel it fading away, fading on you
Searching for something to pray, words I can use
To lay your worry down

It’s not hard to read these lines as haunted in the best sense of the word. There is a longing for something beyond, for something real to grab on to, somewhere to lay one’s burdens down.

The second one comes off Mumford & Sons’ new album Prizefighter. The song is called “Conversation with my Son (Gangsters & Angels).”

Whispers in a ruined house
The leaves that sing with no sound…

I get higher and higher
The lower I go
This upside world
With a knife at its throat
We’re all tumblers and beggars
Your mother and I will show you
Gangsters and angels
Darling, come and see
The cross or the machine?
It’s always the same choice
The best I ever met
Had nothing and gave it all away

We’d rather be ruined than change
And die in our dread
But love your crooked neighbour
With your crooked heart

Reach across again
Here’s where Heaven starts
I end where you begin
With my hand over your heart

A haunted song, if ever there was one. So much going on in there, but what a great line, “whispers in a ruined house.” What a beautiful description of the ways in which Christ persists and lingers in a culture determined to forget him.

I’ve been listening to these two songs this morning as I think about and pray for the guy I met at the jail yesterday. I believe that there are always hearts of flesh seeking to be awakened where there seems to be only stone. I believe that Christ haunts all of our ruined houses—that he will not leave any of us tumblers and beggars, gangsters and angels alone. And that this is our deepest and truest hope.

——

I took the picture above somewhere in northwestern Spain while walking the Camino de Santiago last spring. It was one of many ruined houses that whispered to us along the way. 


Discover more from Rumblings

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 Comments Post a comment
  1. inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205's avatar
    inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205 #

    Pope Leo XIV recently responded to a question by a man ( Rocco) who considered himself an atheist but at the same time, given the beauty and harmony of the natural world around him, couldn’t convince himself to believe in random outcomes and nothingness. Rocco wanted to believe but believed he didn’t and asked the Pope why this might be and what, if anything, he could do.

    Pope Leo, responded by offering a reframing of the question. He suggested that the better question isn’t whether we believe in God but rather are we seeking God.

    He quoted, St. Augustine, forgive my paraphrase but I don’t have the quote in front of me, and Augustine opined that the mistake he had made in searching for God was that he kept looking outside himself (and into the world) for evidence of God’s existence, when all the while the Holy Spirit of God had been dwelling within Him.

    Seek (within) and ye shall find.

    So, based on my own experience, God within does not haunt but rather radiates love, fraternity and holy peace. His presence is known to me and abundant. Always present to me providing I take the time to pray to and with Him and reflect on His reality, within me. The door is always open to me. It is simply up to me to walk through.

    Perhaps those who intuit this spiritual reality but, for whatever reason, refuse to engage or seek a spiritual communion with the Lord, are left feeling haunted but for those who engage with the Lord there is only joy and at times rapture.

    February 26, 2026
    • Ryan's avatar

      I’m obviously using the word “haunt” in a fairly broad way in the post. As I said, the word can have a disquieting, threatening connotation, but it can also refer to a lingering presence. I think Christ lingers in the West. Even when he is ignored, he shows up in our ethics, assumptions, and expectations in all kinds of ways.

      I like Pope Leo’s response to Rocco very much.

      February 26, 2026
  2. inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205's avatar
    inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205 #

    I think, “lingering presence” is a better description than haunted, but I get your point.

    Perhaps you are more optimistic about this reality then I am. I suspect that many, are at best, looking to extrapolate from Christianity what they consider to be consistent with their world view, broadly defined as Christ’s mercy, while at the same time remaining stridently opposed to anything approximating Christ as Lord, God, Savior and Judge. For many in our society, especially within progressive politics, it is now considered a hate crime to even discuss sin and encourage repentance.

    In the end, willingly or not, knowingly or not, they serve the evil one. They will keep only those commandments that appeal to their self righteousness and they will defame and even outlaw, the rest of the Gospel message and look to kill Christ again, bury Him once and for all as it were, in the process.

    February 27, 2026
    • inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205's avatar
      inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205 #

      So reflecting on this comment it is obvious that I’m singling out one side of the political spectrum and not the other. While this is true, I think the decision to do so is defensible and neither partisan or hypocritical.

      In the first place, on my own journey of faith, let me say that every attempt I’ve made to reconcile my faith to a set of political principals, progressive or traditional in nature, has ended in failure.

      For me, I have learned that separation of church and state is essential, if I am to be an honest man of faith. Politics will always prioritize self and group interest before the interests of, “the others”. In fact it is often true of politics that I may, at times, be called to defame, protest against and even go to war and kill the others, in the service of my self and group’s interest.

      In Christ, I am called to love everyone, even my enemies. I am not to seek vengeance, in so far as it is up to me I am to be at peace with all people. Vengeance is the Lord’s alone. He will repay.

      There is no liberal or conservative, progressive or traditional, sociaist or capitalist Christian. There is only Christ crucified for my sins and me choosing to trust Jesus such that he might redeem me and cleanse me of my sins.

      All political systems fail and all who put their trust in them will fail with them. But some systems make redemption less likely than others.

      Modern progressive politics advances agendas like abortion, homosexuality and transgenderism as core human rights in complete defiance of God’s word and God’s commandments. Worse when confronted with this truth, they immediately respond that the Gospels are hateful, homophobic, transphobic and misogynist.

      Their politic is more than politic, it is a pseudo religious set of beliefs that seek to undermine and replace Christianity. It is idolatry realized, practiced and affirmed. It is a manifestation of great moral sin culminating in the, “unforgiveable sin” that being, the rejection of the Holy Spirit. Scripture is clear, there will be no mercy for those who reject the Holy Spirit of God.

      Traditional types, on the other hand, can mostly be described as physical sinners, driven by, old as time, human appetites and self indulgence at the expense of God’s word and the wellbeing of others.

      Still, they purport to be Christian and if confronted with their sins by a convicted, courageous and consistent church(s), I am of the belief that many would be converted to a truer expression of faith and, “saved” for Christ in the process.

      I think, at this moment, the church(s) would be of greater service to God if they worked more energeticly and honestly with those still seeking Christ, to strengthen them in faith rather then make appeals to people whose beliefs cannot be reconciled with the Holy Spirit and the word of God.

      March 2, 2026
      • Ryan's avatar

        I don’t disagree substantively with much of what you say here. As is so often the case, I don’t think it’s either/or (i.e., either we focus on the conservatives or progressives). Christ pursued all kinds of different people prone to all kinds of different errors, sins, longings, hopes and fears. So should we (never forgetting to include ourselves in hte mix).

        March 4, 2026
      • inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205's avatar
        inquisitivelypinkcd4fcbe205 #

        Christ’s powers of persuasion are truly limitless. 🙂 Not so much for His very fallible and finite church. I think priorities matter and it’s been my own experience that supporting and being supported by people of faith, all of us struggling to some degree or other with our own sinful nature’s, creates a real space for the Spirit to be shared among us. Maybe it happenend but I can’t remember a single time when I was a young atheist many years ago, or when I have spoken with young progressives more recently, that the Spirit, ” dwelt among us.”

        Anyways, thanks for your reply. Keep preaching, it matters. 🙂

        March 4, 2026

Leave a comment