Blessed Are the Guilty Who Have Nowhere to Go
Many Mondays as I make the short drive to the jail, I listen to a song by Jon Guerra called “The Kingdom of God.” It’s a beautiful song by a gifted songwriter (Guerra’s most recent album, “Jesus,” has been a mainstay in my headphones since it was released during Lent). The song is basically a creative version of the Beatitudes set to music (with a bit of Psalm 23 mixed in). I listen on Mondays primarily because of one line that hit me like a freight train the first time I heard it and almost never fails to leave me with a lump in my throat: “Blessed are the guilty who have nowhere to go.”
My reasons for playing this song on Mondays are obvious enough. I am about to spend a day with the literal “guilty who have nowhere to go.” I want the time we spend together to be blessed and to be a blessing, to somehow together tap in again to the astonishing reality proclaimed by Jesus that blessing is to be found in unlikely and undesirable places, even among the despised and forgotten. Guerra’s song, like the Beatitudes, anchors me in these bedrock truths of Christian faith, redirecting my heart away from the “blessings” it is more naturally drawn to, reminding me that the kingdom of God bears little resemblance to the kingdoms I so often prefer to seek.
But of course, it is not simply behind literal bars that we find “the guilty who have nowhere to go.” On the deepest level, this is the human condition. To be guilty and to have nowhere to go. This is Adam and Eve covering themselves in the garden. This is Cain with blood-stained hands despairing at his banishment. This is Joseph’s jealous brothers after selling him into slavery. This is Moses on the run after murdering an Egyptian slaver. This is David after he is confronted by the prophet Nathan. This is Peter weeping in the courtyard. This is Judas flinging his guilty change on the temple floor. This is all of us.
There was a time when guilt was assumed to simply be an unfortunate part of the inheritance of religion. Once upon a time people lived in terror of God or the gods, the story went, but once we finally put all that primitive nonsense behind us, we would stand up strong and proud, breathing in the guilt-free air of our emancipated and enlightened state. Except it hasn’t really turned out that way. By many metrics, we in the late modern West are the least overtly religious culture on record, yet we are also the most anxious, judgmental, guilt-ridden, ashamed and depressed. There are many reasons for this. The rise of the smartphone and online culture more generally play a huge role, obviously. But it would also seem that guilt is not so easily eradicated from the human experience. The (allegedly) irreligious among us may not agonize over the inscrutable verdicts of a severe God, but we sure obsess about how we measure up to the constantly shifting and wildly incoherent moral demands of our peers (online and in real life). As Samuel James puts it in his book Digital Liturgies, “Morality, guilt, and punishment have not disappeared. They’re just under new management.”
And when it comes to this new management, it is manifestly not the case that it’s, “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.” The old boss at least offered atonement, forgiveness, absolution, the possibility of redemption. The new boss demands moral perfection (without ever feeling the need to articulate from where or from whom it derives its moral absolutes) but offers no mercy. We may confess our sins, to be sure. Indeed, we must. But instead of words of absolution we will simply be exhorted to “be better” or commit ourselves to “doing the work” or to somehow perform our guilt and sorrow for an unspecified period of digital self-flagellation. The penance is elusive and open-ended. Increasingly, the guilty have literally nowhere to go. The (allegedly) righteous require their guilt for the maintenance of their own fragile identities.
The old boss was a loving and heartsick father. The new boss is a zealous HR director armed with a list of problematic people and positions. The old boss was the friend of sinners. The new boss demands safety and distance from the unclean and incorrect. The old boss was nailed to a cross by a righteous mob and with his last breath said, “Forgive them, they don’t know what they’re doing.” The new boss is a righteous mob.
My favourite line of the Jon Guerra song is that “blessed are the guilty” line. But not because there is any inherent blessing in being or feeling guilty, whether that guilt comes from transgressing the righteous and true commandments of God or the merciless and often misguided judgments of one another. The only reason we can even imagine such a line as truthful and beautiful and hopeful is because the kingdom of God is one where the guilty can have their guilt truthfully named, but where they can also be pardoned, redeemed, and transformed. The guilty can be called blessed because they recognize they do indeed have nowhere to go but to Christ and to his kingdom.
Blessed are the guilty who have nowhere to go
For their hearts have a road to the kingdom of God.
And their souls are the songs of the kingdom of God.
And they will find a refuge, for theirs is the kingdom of God.
——
As in my previous post, the feature image above is taken from Elizabeth Bruenig’s beautiful essay on spending time with the guilty who have nowhere to go.
Discover more from Rumblings
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I’m struggling with this one. Perhaps because I define guilt, in a Christian context, as a post judgement condition.
I don’t think the guilty are blessed. I think they are damned.
“Guilty” is also a pre-judgment state. I have in mind here nothing more than the basic assertions of Romans (and elsewhere) that all have sinned and fallen short of God’s glory, that there is “no one righteous, not even one,” etc. As I explained in the post, “guilt” is in many ways the human condition.
The crucial question, of course, is what we do with our guilt. Where do we go? To whom do we turn? Do we have coherent categories for understanding its source and its remedy? Or (as is mostly the case today) do we lash around, weaponizing guilt with no clear moral foundations to justify it?
Thanks, I understand you better now.
I’m not trying to knit pick, semantics but I think it would be better to say all have sinned rather than all are guilty. All believing sinners (in word and deed) have been redeemed by the blood of Christ and will be absolved of their sins. Though their sins be red as scarlett, they will be made as white as snow, as the saying goes. Those who reject Christ are already guilty and have condemned themselves, is also a right biblical understanding.
I do agree with your description of the term culturally and with the human propensity to feel guilty.
As always I think that the love of Christ, manifest in our actions, convicts and the better argument often fails. Especially in these, as you say, “weaponized” times.
Thanks for another thoughtful and concise post. While I often disagree with what you prioritize, my, my you are a first rate writer.
Perhaps this is nothing more than the contrast between objective and subjective guilt.
Objectively, the repentant Christian’s guilt has been absolved, dealt with on the cross by Christ.
Subjectively, we remain sinners and so we still feel guilty not only when we sin, but at the basic human experience of Romans 7, wanting to do what is good, doing that which we hate, etc (even as Christians who know our sins have been forgiven).
As an aside, you’ve been critical of rational arguments in your last few comments. For example:
So, a simple question occurs to me. Why bother reading this blog? Why bother engaging in rational argument? Why bother trying to persuade me (or anyone else) of anything? Why not just focus on manifesting the love of Christ in your community and leave spaces like these to those who persist in believing that rational arguments still serve a purpose?
Thank you, also, for your kind words.
Good question, but not a, “gotcha”. At least I don’t think it is.
It isn’t that I am dismissive of conversation and a debate of ideas, after all as you rightly point out I persistently engage in that practice here. It’s not an either/or proposition for me, it’s a question of priority.To me, acts of love have greater influence then compelling theological or sociological arguments. It’s clear you agree. I think most Christian’s do. So maybe when we write then, it would be better to discuss what Christ’s love is. How to recognize it. How to participate in it. The disciplines it demands of us. How we can live in it and how we can share it with others.
Just write about Jesus, Jesus and more Jesus.
I’ve read a fair bit on line from many who write about our faith and few write as well as you. Your command of the language and your ability to express the many nuances of your viewpoints, often astounds me but I sometimes wish it was less pedantic and more love centered and passionate. I want you to, “Preach it Preacherman!!”….I know, not how you intend to use this space. Not really in your nature. I should look elsewhere and several other reasonable and honest perspectives you’ve shared with me over the years, and still I persist.
I think there are great works in you and I sense your hesitancy. So I push….
If nothing else I become a better writer and thinker because of you and that is no small thing to me.
Thank you, Ryan. You’ve made a positive difference in my faith and in my life.
Paul
Wasn’t looking for a “gotcha,” it was just an honest question.
I understand that you think I should have different priorities and should be bolder, less hesitant, more eager to jump in to the culture wars, etc. You’ve expressed this many times. All I can say is that I am attempting to be faithful to what I see as the call of God in my life.
Yes, you are a faithful man.
So I wanted to take a little time to answer your last response here, other then to say (and I mean it when I say it), that you are a man of faith.
I think, through a combination of poor writing on my part and some misunderstanding on your part, you have the wrong idea about what I mean when I challenge the way you engage with modern culture.
Frankly, wether it offends you or not, I am disappointed by what a brilliant writer and faithful man like you, chooses to engage with, in this space.
Rather then find you not engaging with culture or “culture wars” enough, I find your persistent engagement with cultural sources like many secular writers and thinkers, mainstream media sources and musicians turned pseudo Christian therapists, mostly a waste of your time and talent.
I challenge you to look at the great Christian works that have preceded you and break those down for your audience. Breath new life into them, make them understandable and inspiring to people truly seeking and making an effort to follow the ways of Jesus Christ. Serve the kingdom with the great talents God has blessed you with.
Go and write where the people are and not where you feel less offended. Don’t take this lunatics word for it, fast and ask the Spirit to lead you…
So there is this story in scripture where a persistently nagging women hounds a magistrate until he finally gives in to her requests. I am your nagging women, you are my magistrate.
Smile. It’s not as crazy or as offensive as it reads. It’s something of a, “Glasgow kiss” to be sure but it is written in love.
BTW, you are still on my bucket list of people to meet. I will be going out west, for the first time in my life, next year or the year after, God willing and I’m sure to show up at your church when I do.
Don’t worry, I won’t stay long. I’m only good for about half a bottle of Heineken, (on a good day) as I gas up like a Ferrari, these days.
Just long enough for a toast, a handshake and a hug….and maybe try to improve your musical tastes. Your boy, Nick Cave thinks the song, “Becalmed” by Brian Eno is the second best song he has ever heard. When you have the chance to be alone and reflect on some great loss or regret in your life that you would or have wanted God to heal, listen to that song. If Becalmed doesn’t sound like that kind of healing to you, then we can talk about something else as you are clearly a musical reprobate. 😉
I doubt there is anything that I can say in response to this that I haven’t said in the past, so I will simply thank you for sharing your thoughts here.